RESUMO
OBJETIVO: Avaliar a segurança e eficácia da estratégia de tratamento cirúrgico ou conservador em pacientes com de lesões duvidosas de tronco da coronária esquerda (TCE), baseada nos achados do ultra-som intracoronariano (USIC). MÉTODOS: Incluídos 66 pacientes consecutivos com lesões angiograficamente duvidosas no TCE submetidos a avaliação ao USIC. Foram divididos em dois grupos de acordo com os achados do USIC. Grupo I, mantidos em tratamento clínico [área mínima da luz (AML) > 6,0 mm² e/ou diâmetro mínimo da luz (DML) > 2,5 mm] e Grupo II, encaminhados a revascularização (AML < 6,0 mm² e/ou DML < 2,5 mm). Avaliou-se a ocorrência de eventos cardíacos maiores (óbito, infarto agudo do miocárdio e/ou revascularização da lesão alvo) durante a evolução. RESULTADOS: Quarenta e um (62 por cento) pacientes foram alocados no Grupo I e 25 (38 por cento) no Grupo II. A média de seguimento foi de 42,1 meses. A angiografia coronariana não conseguiu diferenciar os dois grupos pela gravidade da lesão (DML 1,98 mm Grupo I versus 1,72 mm Grupo II, p = 0,75) ao contrário do USIC (DML 3,41 mm Grupo I versus 2,01 mm Grupo II, p < 0,001). Não houve óbito ou infarto do miocárdio no Grupo I. A sobrevida livre de eventos cardíacos maiores foi de 95 por cento no grupo I versus 87,5 por cento no Grupo II (p=ns). CONCLUSÃO: A estratégia de decisão de tratamento de pacientes com lesões angiograficamente duvidosas no TCE, guiada pelos achado do USIC, mostrou-se segura e eficaz.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment approach vs. conservative approach in patients with ambiguous lesions in the left main coronary artery (LMCA), based on intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) findings. METHODS: Sixty-six consecutive patients with angiographically ambiguous lesions were included and submitted to ICUS assessment. They were divided in two groups, according to the ICUS findings. Group I was maintained under clinical treatment [minimal lumen area (MLA) > 6.0 mm² and/or minimal lumen diameter (MLD) > 2.5 mm] and Group II was submitted to revascularization (MLA < 6.0 mm² and/or MLD < 2.5 mm). The occurrence of major cardiac events (death, acute myocardial infarction and/or revascularization of the target lesion) was assessed during follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-one (62 percent) patients were allocated in Group I and 25 (38 percent) in Group II. Mean follow-up was 42.1 months. The coronary angiography did not differentiate the two groups regarding lesion severity (MLD 1.98 mm in Group I vs. 1.72 mm in Group II; p = 0.75) in opposition to ICUS (MLD 3.41 mm in Group I vs. 2.01 mm in Group II; p < 0.001). There was no death or myocardial infarction in Group I. The survival rate free of major cardiac events was 95 percent in Group I vs. 87.5 percent in Group II (p=ns). CONCLUSION: Treatment decision-making of patients with ambiguous lesions in the LMCA guided by ICUS findings showed to be safe and effective.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Revascularização Miocárdica , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Angiografia Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Tomada de Decisões , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Seguimentos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment approach vs. conservative approach in patients with ambiguous lesions in the left main coronary artery (LMCA), based on intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) findings. METHODS: Sixty-six consecutive patients with angiographically ambiguous lesions were included and submitted to ICUS assessment. They were divided in two groups, according to the ICUS findings. Group I was maintained under clinical treatment [minimal lumen area (MLA) > 6.0 mm(2) and/or minimal lumen diameter (MLD) > 2.5 mm] and Group II was submitted to revascularization (MLA < 6.0 mm(2) and/or MLD < 2.5 mm). The occurrence of major cardiac events (death, acute myocardial infarction and/or revascularization of the target lesion) was assessed during follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-one (62%) patients were allocated in Group I and 25 (38%) in Group II. Mean follow-up was 42.1 months. The coronary angiography did not differentiate the two groups regarding lesion severity (MLD 1.98 mm in Group I vs. 1.72 mm in Group II; p = 0.75) in opposition to ICUS (MLD 3.41 mm in Group I vs. 2.01 mm in Group II; p < 0.001). There was no death or myocardial infarction in Group I. The survival rate free of major cardiac events was 95% in Group I vs. 87.5% in Group II (p=ns). CONCLUSION: Treatment decision-making of patients with ambiguous lesions in the LMCA guided by ICUS findings showed to be safe and effective.
